<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic Recovery: my 5 point plan&#8230; (also known as stay out of other people&#8217;s businesses)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/</link>
	<description>Political, economic and religious commentary... the three things you should never talk about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Davies</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Glad your likeing it. 

Really opened my eyes to some of the stuff going on and how things actually work.

ive been recommending people everywhere to view it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad your likeing it. </p>
<p>Really opened my eyes to some of the stuff going on and how things actually work.</p>
<p>ive been recommending people everywhere to view it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Y Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Y Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Dude, that series is brilliant... I&#039;ll be linking to it, top stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, that series is brilliant&#8230; I&#8217;ll be linking to it, top stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Davies</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-420</guid>
		<description>http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse.

Its a 20 part series to view online. or a dvd can be purchased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse</a>.</p>
<p>Its a 20 part series to view online. or a dvd can be purchased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Y Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Y Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 04:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-419</guid>
		<description>No I haven&#039;t, do you have a link or something you can point me to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I haven&#8217;t, do you have a link or something you can point me to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Davies</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-418</guid>
		<description>That is a good plan.

Incidently have you viewed The Crash Course by Chris Martenson. i think you would like the content. or at least i some referance materials for new posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good plan.</p>
<p>Incidently have you viewed The Crash Course by Chris Martenson. i think you would like the content. or at least i some referance materials for new posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Y Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Y Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-417</guid>
		<description>The state government issue is a tough one... because like you said, the states can take over the massive taxing from the Federal government.  However, as it is a state government, you can become more intimately involved in shaping the political system because it&#039;s closer to you... these people are your neighbors and not some politician living in Canberra in the middle of nowhere.  And if things get really oppressive, move to another state.  It&#039;s not perfect, but it&#039;s an improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The state government issue is a tough one&#8230; because like you said, the states can take over the massive taxing from the Federal government.  However, as it is a state government, you can become more intimately involved in shaping the political system because it&#8217;s closer to you&#8230; these people are your neighbors and not some politician living in Canberra in the middle of nowhere.  And if things get really oppressive, move to another state.  It&#8217;s not perfect, but it&#8217;s an improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Y Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Y Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-416</guid>
		<description>On Iraq and Afghanistan... I was a neo-con before Sept/Oct last year so I was regrettably in favor of a lot of these actions.  Once the economic reality hit me at the end of last year, before the crash, my position changed rather quickly.  Regardless of whether you think it&#039;s good vs bad for us to go into Iraq in the first place, we simply can&#039;t afford it.  I&#039;m happy Saddam is gone and that Iraqis have a chance of setting up there own government, but I think everyone knows in retrospect that we should have avoided the place.  With Afghanistan, I agree with Ron Paul in that the original mission was to get Al Qaeda wherever they go... but nation building etc, can&#039;t afford it.  Again it&#039;s nice that the place has a taste of freedom, but we can&#039;t afford it.

Our defense budget for me makes a lot of sense because the Australian government see the future in regards to the US: their party is over.  Their ability to fight wars overseas in defense of other nations will soon be over once their dollar significantly devalues or dare I say collapse.  So the Aussie government has to basically factor that in to it&#039;s military strategy... we need to be able to defend ourselves when America isn&#039;t there, which means a big military boost.  That&#039;s not so bad if we concurrently cut other major items off our budget that aren&#039;t legitimate powers to the Federal government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Iraq and Afghanistan&#8230; I was a neo-con before Sept/Oct last year so I was regrettably in favor of a lot of these actions.  Once the economic reality hit me at the end of last year, before the crash, my position changed rather quickly.  Regardless of whether you think it&#8217;s good vs bad for us to go into Iraq in the first place, we simply can&#8217;t afford it.  I&#8217;m happy Saddam is gone and that Iraqis have a chance of setting up there own government, but I think everyone knows in retrospect that we should have avoided the place.  With Afghanistan, I agree with Ron Paul in that the original mission was to get Al Qaeda wherever they go&#8230; but nation building etc, can&#8217;t afford it.  Again it&#8217;s nice that the place has a taste of freedom, but we can&#8217;t afford it.</p>
<p>Our defense budget for me makes a lot of sense because the Australian government see the future in regards to the US: their party is over.  Their ability to fight wars overseas in defense of other nations will soon be over once their dollar significantly devalues or dare I say collapse.  So the Aussie government has to basically factor that in to it&#8217;s military strategy&#8230; we need to be able to defend ourselves when America isn&#8217;t there, which means a big military boost.  That&#8217;s not so bad if we concurrently cut other major items off our budget that aren&#8217;t legitimate powers to the Federal government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Y Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Y Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Hey man,

First off I&#039;d just like to say that I appreciate the keen interest... it&#039;s great to find another Rothbardian in the blogosphere!

What have I been reading?  Well I&#039;ve been listening to a lot of stuff from the Mises institute... Woods, DiLorenzo, Block, Rothbard, Tucker etc.  I&#039;ve also read a little of &#039;A Case for a 100% Gold Dollar&#039; by Rothbard, which I though was fantastic.  I&#039;m in the middle of reading Meltdown, but it&#039;s really nothing new.  I got into all of this through Peter Schiff though, so he&#039;s a heavy influence.

All your points are correct, although in my experience an &#039;anarchy now&#039; approach isn&#039;t something I&#039;d personally prefer.  I&#039;m a constitutional republic kinda guy, so I&#039;d like to see political reform.  I think for the sake of most people in the mainstream, going into my 5 point plan would have to happen in steps.  People really do care about transitions, so I think this is where the libertarian movement should invest some time in developing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey man,</p>
<p>First off I&#8217;d just like to say that I appreciate the keen interest&#8230; it&#8217;s great to find another Rothbardian in the blogosphere!</p>
<p>What have I been reading?  Well I&#8217;ve been listening to a lot of stuff from the Mises institute&#8230; Woods, DiLorenzo, Block, Rothbard, Tucker etc.  I&#8217;ve also read a little of &#8216;A Case for a 100% Gold Dollar&#8217; by Rothbard, which I though was fantastic.  I&#8217;m in the middle of reading Meltdown, but it&#8217;s really nothing new.  I got into all of this through Peter Schiff though, so he&#8217;s a heavy influence.</p>
<p>All your points are correct, although in my experience an &#8216;anarchy now&#8217; approach isn&#8217;t something I&#8217;d personally prefer.  I&#8217;m a constitutional republic kinda guy, so I&#8217;d like to see political reform.  I think for the sake of most people in the mainstream, going into my 5 point plan would have to happen in steps.  People really do care about transitions, so I think this is where the libertarian movement should invest some time in developing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Shaw</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 15:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-412</guid>
		<description>On national defence, what are your thoughts on Iraq and Afghanistan? The government recently said that the &quot;defence&quot; spending would be up by 3% each year until 2018 and then 2.2% each year until 2030. I calculated that this will almost double our current $20B/year to $40B/year by 2030...

My girlfriend was saying that they must know something that we don&#039;t. I&#039;m certainly concerned by the news at the moment which seems to offer war and rumours of wars as well as civil unrest and military coups. People sure do seem extra nervous at present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On national defence, what are your thoughts on Iraq and Afghanistan? The government recently said that the &#8220;defence&#8221; spending would be up by 3% each year until 2018 and then 2.2% each year until 2030. I calculated that this will almost double our current $20B/year to $40B/year by 2030&#8230;</p>
<p>My girlfriend was saying that they must know something that we don&#8217;t. I&#8217;m certainly concerned by the news at the moment which seems to offer war and rumours of wars as well as civil unrest and military coups. People sure do seem extra nervous at present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Shaw</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/04/my-5-point-plan/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Wow, Nice plan. What have you been reading?

Haven&#039;t heard of optional debentures before. Are you essentially talking about term-deposits, CDs, what Rothbard calls &quot;timed deposits&quot;?

I reckon you can merge 2 and 3 but I guess it depends on where you&#039;re coming from (you&#039;re miniarchist and I tend now to favour &quot;anarchy&quot; but I hate the term - I prefer &quot;voluntarist/voluntaryist&quot;). Your number 3 is what I&#039;d refer to as &quot;free banking&quot;. In this scenario, you could allow FRB to die a natural death. I reckon it would be difficult or impossible to ban FRB outright/instantly anyway. In order to have private monies it seems necessary to get rid of CGT and GST otherwise the other monies could not compete on an equal footing - so your step 4 works right in with that. Probably should abolish the legal tender laws too as part of private-coinage/free-banking.

If you&#039;re going to allow the state governments to tax me to death then I&#039;d want the option to personally &quot;secede&quot; from the state. I think of this as &quot;opting out&quot;. I&#039;ve heard this called micro-secession or panarchy but only came across those terms recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Nice plan. What have you been reading?</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t heard of optional debentures before. Are you essentially talking about term-deposits, CDs, what Rothbard calls &#8220;timed deposits&#8221;?</p>
<p>I reckon you can merge 2 and 3 but I guess it depends on where you&#8217;re coming from (you&#8217;re miniarchist and I tend now to favour &#8220;anarchy&#8221; but I hate the term &#8211; I prefer &#8220;voluntarist/voluntaryist&#8221;). Your number 3 is what I&#8217;d refer to as &#8220;free banking&#8221;. In this scenario, you could allow FRB to die a natural death. I reckon it would be difficult or impossible to ban FRB outright/instantly anyway. In order to have private monies it seems necessary to get rid of CGT and GST otherwise the other monies could not compete on an equal footing &#8211; so your step 4 works right in with that. Probably should abolish the legal tender laws too as part of private-coinage/free-banking.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to allow the state governments to tax me to death then I&#8217;d want the option to personally &#8220;secede&#8221; from the state. I think of this as &#8220;opting out&#8221;. I&#8217;ve heard this called micro-secession or panarchy but only came across those terms recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
