<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Budget:  I&#8217;ve had softer toilet paper&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/the-budget-ive-had-softer-toilet-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/the-budget-ive-had-softer-toilet-paper/</link>
	<description>Political, economic and religious commentary... the three things you should never talk about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Washington Y Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/the-budget-ive-had-softer-toilet-paper/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Y Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=577#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t hear it... although I predict my response wouldn&#039;t be filled with excitement.

Ultimately political thought it shaped by economic policy... because money buys change, influence and political brownie points.  Unless political economics undergoes a radical change to something more sensible (i.e. Austrian School Economics), we&#039;re going to get two political parties that essentially agree on monetary and fiscal policy with minor alterations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t hear it&#8230; although I predict my response wouldn&#8217;t be filled with excitement.</p>
<p>Ultimately political thought it shaped by economic policy&#8230; because money buys change, influence and political brownie points.  Unless political economics undergoes a radical change to something more sensible (i.e. Austrian School Economics), we&#8217;re going to get two political parties that essentially agree on monetary and fiscal policy with minor alterations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Davies</title>
		<link>http://drwasho.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/the-budget-ive-had-softer-toilet-paper/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwasho.wordpress.com/?p=577#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Yes it was interesting.

what did you think of the oppositions reply on thursday night?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it was interesting.</p>
<p>what did you think of the oppositions reply on thursday night?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
